ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
Utility Working Conference and Vendor Technology Expo (UWC 2024)
August 4–7, 2024
Marco Island, FL|JW Marriott Marco Island
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Four million nuclear jobs by 2050: Who will do them?
Industry leaders from around the globe met this month to discuss the talent development that will be necessary for the long-term success of the nuclear industry.
The International Conference on Nuclear Knowledge Management and Human Resources Development, hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency, was held in Vienna earlier this month. Discussed there was the agency’s forecast for nuclear capacity to more than double—or hopefully triple—by 2050 and the requirement of more than four million professionals to support the industry.
Erhard A. Fischer, Werner Maschek
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 173-186
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33718
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The role of vapor bubble dynamics during an energetic superprompt critical power excursion in a liquid-metal-cooled fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) unprotected loss-of-flow accident is examined by extending a known bubble dynamics model to the case of a rapid temperature rise. Generally, bubble dynamics is expected to influence such an excursion in at least two ways: 1. The fuel vapor pressure buildup—an important shutdown mechanism for the nuclear excursion—could be delayed by limiting the fuel evaporation rate; this would mean large superheat of the liquid fuel. 2. Shrinkage of initially present bubbles during the excursion could cause a strong reduction of neutron streaming, and therefore increase the reactivity of the system (potential of an autocatalytic effect). Both problems have been studied in this paper, and the following results have been obtained: For the rather high heating rate of 400 K/ms, fuel vapor bubbles grow for typically 1.5 ms, and then shrink again due to the rapidly rising pressure. Growth rates are found to be fast enough so that the expected delay in vapor pressure buildup is small and can be neglected in core disassembly analysis. The case that the initial configuration is a boiling fuel/steel pool was further examined. The pool has a high void fraction due to the presence of steel vapor bubbles. Collapse of these bubbles during a temperature transient was studied with the bubble dynamics model. The associated reduction in the neutron streaming effect leads to an increase in reactivity. Its influence on the nuclear excursion was examined with the core disassembly code KADIS, using a modified Behrens formula for the streaming reactivity. The data of a homogeneous 300-MW(electric) class LMFBR were used, with a 33 dollar/s reactivity ramp resulting from a recriticality driven by fuel compaction. Although the total streaming reactivity is as large as 2.32 dollars, it was found that its influence on the course of the power transient is only weak, because the bulk of it is released, at a high rate, only after the power peak, when nuclear shutdown by gross material motion is already in progress.
