ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Survey says . . . Emotional intelligence important in nuclear industry
The American Nuclear Society’s Diversity and Inclusion in ANS (DIA) Committee hosted a workshop social at the 2024 Winter Conference & Expo in November that brought dozens of attendees together for an engaging—and educational—twist on the game show Family Feud.
Erhard A. Fischer, Werner Maschek
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 173-186
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33718
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The role of vapor bubble dynamics during an energetic superprompt critical power excursion in a liquid-metal-cooled fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) unprotected loss-of-flow accident is examined by extending a known bubble dynamics model to the case of a rapid temperature rise. Generally, bubble dynamics is expected to influence such an excursion in at least two ways: 1. The fuel vapor pressure buildup—an important shutdown mechanism for the nuclear excursion—could be delayed by limiting the fuel evaporation rate; this would mean large superheat of the liquid fuel. 2. Shrinkage of initially present bubbles during the excursion could cause a strong reduction of neutron streaming, and therefore increase the reactivity of the system (potential of an autocatalytic effect). Both problems have been studied in this paper, and the following results have been obtained: For the rather high heating rate of 400 K/ms, fuel vapor bubbles grow for typically 1.5 ms, and then shrink again due to the rapidly rising pressure. Growth rates are found to be fast enough so that the expected delay in vapor pressure buildup is small and can be neglected in core disassembly analysis. The case that the initial configuration is a boiling fuel/steel pool was further examined. The pool has a high void fraction due to the presence of steel vapor bubbles. Collapse of these bubbles during a temperature transient was studied with the bubble dynamics model. The associated reduction in the neutron streaming effect leads to an increase in reactivity. Its influence on the nuclear excursion was examined with the core disassembly code KADIS, using a modified Behrens formula for the streaming reactivity. The data of a homogeneous 300-MW(electric) class LMFBR were used, with a 33 dollar/s reactivity ramp resulting from a recriticality driven by fuel compaction. Although the total streaming reactivity is as large as 2.32 dollars, it was found that its influence on the course of the power transient is only weak, because the bulk of it is released, at a high rate, only after the power peak, when nuclear shutdown by gross material motion is already in progress.