ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS continues to expand its certificate offerings
It’s almost been a full year since the American Nuclear Society held its inaugural section of Nuclear 101, a comprehensive certificate course on the basics of the nuclear field. Offered at the 2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo, that first sold-out course marked a massive milestone in the Society’s expanding work in professional development and certification.
Gary S. Was, Ronald Christensen, Chang Park, Richard W. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 2 | November 1985 | Pages 445-457
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33697
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A set of statistical patterns characterizing the conditions for failure of Type 304 stainless steel clad light water reactor fuel is formulated using a 450-assembly cycle data base from the Connecticut Yankee reactor and an information-theoretic (entropy) criterion of pattern formation. The pattern files, consisting of features formulated from output data obtained from the deterministic fuel performance code FCODE-BETA/SS, are partitioned into five failure and six nonfailure patterns. The failure probabilities of the patterns span the 0.17 to 37.47% range, as compared with the data base average of 2.86%. Features that contribute to failure patterns include large swings in the linear power at high burnup, frequent stress cycling at the ridge, and low coolant pH at high linear power. Contributing to nonfailure are low fission gas release, high axial uniformity in linear power, peak burnup, and clad creep strain at the ridge. The feature describing cycling of the linear power agrees qualitatively with previously identified factors contributing to failure of stainless steel clad fuel in the Connecticut Yankee reactor. From an operational standpoint, the fuel failure probability can be reduced by minimizing the number and magnitude of power ramps and maintaining a neutral coolant pH.