ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
IAEA again raises global nuclear power projections
Noting recent momentum behind nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency has revised up its projections for the expansion of nuclear power, estimating that global nuclear operational capacity will more than double by 2050—reaching 2.6 times the 2024 level—with small modular reactors expected to play a pivotal role in this high-case scenario.
IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi announced the new projections, contained in the annual report Energy, Electricity, and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050 at the 69th IAEA General Conference in Vienna.
In the report’s high-case scenario, nuclear electrical generating capacity is projected to increase to from 377 GW at the end of 2024 to 992 GW by 2050. In a low-case scenario, capacity rises 50 percent, compared with 2024, to 561 GW. SMRs are projected to account for 24 percent of the new capacity added in the high case and for 5 percent in the low case.
Charles W. Bagnal, Jr., Gerard P. Cavanaugh, Robert P. Harris, Regis A. Matzie, Laszlo B. Tarko
Nuclear Technology | Volume 68 | Number 1 | January 1985 | Pages 7-17
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33562
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Fuel management and core periphery modifications are examined for slowing pressurized water reactor (PWR) pressure vessel embrittlement by reducing the incident fast flux to the vessel Such strategies can help to mitigate the consequences of pressurized thermal shock, a current licensing concern. For most operating PWRs, a factor of 2 reduction in fast flux to the reactor vessel critical welds can be achieved with little or no penalty in power peaking (3% or less), which implies only a small degradation in thermal margin. This can be accomplished with low leakage fuel management, which places twice-burned fuel near these welds. To achieve higher reduction factors, materials with good fast neutron attenuation properties must be used in conjunction with low leakage fuel management. For example, a reduction factor of 3 implies a limited use of dummy stainless steel assemblies (with an associated increase in power peaking of at least 8%) or the use of stainless steel patches between the core and the vessel In general, a factor of 3 reduction in fast flux is a practical upper limit to what can be reasonably achieved without significant degradation of thermal margin. A factor of 5 reduction may be possible in some cases, but would require the liberal use of dummy assemblies and/or stainless steel patches; a fast flux reduction by a factor of >5 would most likely require power derating.