ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Blades-in turbine inspections at Quad Cities set new benchmark for Constellation
When Constellation decided to install replacement Alstom low-pressure turbines at three of its boiling water reactor plants more than 15 years ago, one benefit was knowing the new turbines should operate reliably—and without major inspections—for several years.
Ansar Parvez
Nuclear Technology | Volume 68 | Number 2 | February 1985 | Pages 235-241
Technical Paper | Fabrication of Components of the Creys-Malville Plant / Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33556
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of the introduction of 236U because of the recycling of nuclear fuel has been determined for a typical pressurized water reactor fuel cycle. It has been estimated that an extra 0.255 g of 235U is required for each gram of 236U present at the beginning of exposure. In terms of cost, the additional 235U translates into an ∼1% increase in the fuel cost for every gram of 236U. The value of the uranium component of the exposed fuel has also been calculated in terms of the savings in separative work and the feed requirements resulting from the use of recycled uranium. While the exact value depends on the fuel cycle component costs and the relative concentrations of 235U and 236U, it is estimated that even after accounting for the presence of 236U, the use of reprocessed uranium may result in a total saving of ∼14% in ore and enrichment costs. It was also found that upon repeated recycling, 236U reaches an equilibrium concentration, but only if the recycled fuel ratio in the feed to enrichment plant is limited to about 1 part in 5.