ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
George A. Jensen, A. M. Platt, George B. Mellinger, William J. Bjorklund
Nuclear Technology | Volume 65 | Number 2 | May 1984 | Pages 305-324
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33413
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Spent nuclear fuels contain significant quantities of three of the platinum-group metals—ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium—plus a related element, technetium, which is nearly absent in nature. Applications for the ruthenium, rhodium, and palladium are well established, and, since the supply of these and other noble metals is largely from foreign sources, they are considered strategic materials. Thus, there is considerable incentive to recover them from nuclear fuels. The technical feasibility of using fission product (FP) noble metals extensively in industry depends on resolution of three major problems: 1. They must be thoroughly decontaminated from all other radioactive materials in the waste stream. 2. They must be separated from one another in very high purity because of internal decay processes. 3. Applications selected must provide appropriate control of radioactivity or the radioisotopes must be removed by isotope-separation techniques or normal decay. Lead extraction as a method for recovering palladium, rhodium, and ruthenium from FP mixtures is examined. In this method, the mixture of FP oxides is combined with glass-forming chemicals, a metal oxide such as lead oxide (PbO) (called a scavenging agent), and a reducing agent such as charcoal. When this mixture is melted, a metal button is formed, which extracts the noble metals. The remainder of the melt cools to form a glass that may be suitable for nuclear waste storage. Lead oxide was found to be the most promising of the potential scavengers. It was reduced by all of the reducing agents tested, and higher density of lead may facilitate the separation of the metal from the glass. Use of PbO also appeared to have no detrimental effect on the glass quality. Charcoal was identified as the preferred reducing agent for technical and economic reasons. As long as a separable metal phase was formed in the melt, noble-metal recovery was not dependent on the amount of reducing agent and scavenger oxide (PbO, SrO, CuO, Bi2O3, Sb2O3) used in these experiments. Not all reducing agents studied (graphite, charcoal, silicon, flour, cornstarch, and sugar), however, were able to reduce all scavenger oxides to metal. Only graphite would reduce SnO and CuO and allow noble-metal recovery. The scavenger oxides Sb2O3, Bi2O3, and PbO, however, were reduced by all of the reducing agents tested. Similar noble-metal recovery was found with each. Although detailed evaluation of the waste-storage-related properties of the glass was beyond the scope of this work, the glass was briefly investigated. Glasses in which PbO was used as the scavenging agent were found to be homogeneous in appearance. In addition, the resistance to leaching of the glass tested was found to be close to that of certain waste glasses. Environmental risks from the lead in the waste glass were not evaluated.