ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Wolfgang Dienst, Peter Hofmann, Deborah K. Kerwin-Peck
Nuclear Technology | Volume 65 | Number 1 | April 1984 | Pages 109-124
Technical Paper | Postaccident Debris Cooling / Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33378
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The chemical interaction between solid and liquid Zircaloy-4 and solid UO2 was examined in the temperature region 1000 to 2000°C in argon. The solid/ solid reaction experiments were performed with short light water reactor fuel rod sections with an external pressure of 1 to 80 bar. The annealing times varied between 60 and 9000 s. The reaction experiments with liquid Zircaloy were performed in UO2 crucibles between 1800 and 2000°C. In addition, the wetting behavior between liquid Zircaloy and UO2 was also examined. The extent of the chemical interaction below the melting point of Zircaloy depends decisively on the solid/solid contact between fuel and cladding. If good contact exists, Zircaloy reduces UO2 to form oxygen-stabilized α-Zr(O) and metallic uranium. The uranium reacts with zirconium to form a (U,Zr) alloy, which lies between two α-Zr(O) layers. The UO2/Zircaloy-4 reaction obeys a parabolic rate law. The rate-determining step in the reaction is the diffusion of oxyen into Zircaloy. The growth of the different reaction zones can be represented in an Arrhenius diagram. The extent of the reaction between liquid Zircaloy and UO2 depends on the wetting behavior. A Zircaloy melt rich in oxygen wets UO2 better than a melt poor in oxygen. Molten Zircaloy containing little or no oxygen reacts with UO2 to form a homogeneous (U,Zr,O) melt. As the oxygen content of the melt increases, solid (U,Zr)O2-x particles precipitate. The technical significance of these out-of-pile UO2/Zircaloy reaction experiments is that Zircaloy cladding can be oxidized by UO2 fuel as quickly as by steam, and that UO2, far below its melting point, can be “liquefied” by molten Zircaloy. As a consequence, release of fission gas and volatile fission products is enhanced.