ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
R. C. Searle
Nuclear Technology | Volume 64 | Number 2 | February 1984 | Pages 166-174
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33339
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Guidelines have been drawn up for the selection of possible sites for high-level radioactive waste disposal in or on the seabed, which were prepared for the U.K. Department of the Environment. The first step in producing the guidelines was to identify potential failure modes for each disposal option. The guidelines were then developed on the basis of minimizing such failures. No detailed attempt has been made to rank the guidelines, since a proper evaluation of any disposal site must include an analysis of all the interdependent components of the disposal system. However, for disposal within the seabed, the main emphasis is on the geological stability and barrier properties of the disposal medium (the seabed rocks or sediments) and on the engineering feasibility. Among the more important factors are that any site should be well away from areas that are seismically or volcanically active and should avoid areas of high relief where seafloor sediments are unstable. It is also important to show that the area has been geologically stable over a time greater than the timescale of waste decay. The disposal medium should have low water permeability and low coefficients of ionic diffusivity. For on-the-seabed disposal, physical oceanographic considerations are judged most important, but in our present state of knowledge it is much more difficult to determine what, if any, site-specific considerations should apply in this case.