ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
RP3C Community of Practice’s fifth anniversary
In February, the Community of Practice (CoP) webinar series, hosted by the American Nuclear Society Standards Board’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policies Committee (RP3C), celebrated its fifth anniversary. Like so many online events, these CoPs brought people together at a time when interacting with others became challenging in early 2020. Since the kickoff CoP, which highlighted the impact that systems engineering has on the design of NuScale’s small modular reactor, the last Friday of most months has featured a new speaker leading a discussion on the use of risk-informed, performance-based (RIPB) thinking in the nuclear industry. Providing a venue to convene for people within ANS and those who found their way online by another route, CoPs are an opportunity for the community to receive answers to their burning questions about the subject at hand. With 50–100 active online participants most months, the conversation is always lively, and knowledge flows freely.
R. C. Searle
Nuclear Technology | Volume 64 | Number 2 | February 1984 | Pages 166-174
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33339
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Guidelines have been drawn up for the selection of possible sites for high-level radioactive waste disposal in or on the seabed, which were prepared for the U.K. Department of the Environment. The first step in producing the guidelines was to identify potential failure modes for each disposal option. The guidelines were then developed on the basis of minimizing such failures. No detailed attempt has been made to rank the guidelines, since a proper evaluation of any disposal site must include an analysis of all the interdependent components of the disposal system. However, for disposal within the seabed, the main emphasis is on the geological stability and barrier properties of the disposal medium (the seabed rocks or sediments) and on the engineering feasibility. Among the more important factors are that any site should be well away from areas that are seismically or volcanically active and should avoid areas of high relief where seafloor sediments are unstable. It is also important to show that the area has been geologically stable over a time greater than the timescale of waste decay. The disposal medium should have low water permeability and low coefficients of ionic diffusivity. For on-the-seabed disposal, physical oceanographic considerations are judged most important, but in our present state of knowledge it is much more difficult to determine what, if any, site-specific considerations should apply in this case.