ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Hash Hashemian: Visionary leadership
As Dr. Hashem M. “Hash” Hashemian prepares to step into his term as President of the American Nuclear Society, he is clear that he wants to make the most of this unique moment.
A groundswell in public approval of nuclear is finding a home in growing governmental support that is backed by a tailwind of technological innovation. “Now is a good time to be in nuclear,” Hashemian said, as he explained the criticality of this moment and what he hoped to accomplish as president.
Werner Maschek, Margaret W. Asprey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 63 | Number 2 | November 1983 | Pages 330-336
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33291
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The behavior of a homogeneous reactor core of the 300-MW(electric) class has been evaluated during the pretransition and transition phases of a hypothetical loss-of-flow accident without scram. The SIMMER-II code has been used to track core material redistribution processes, which can lead to recriticalities and secondary nuclear power excursions. One of the key questions of core disruptive accident analysis is if core meltdown inevitably leads to a bottled-up core situation with its energetics potential or if various phenomena exist (as material discharge of hot fuel through the axial blankets, drop-in of blanket material into the core region, etc.) that prevent the accident progression into a bottled-up transition phase pool. The analyses for the specified reactor design show that, taking into account the aforementioned phenomena, the dominant accident path will lead to the postaccident heat removal phase directly from the pretransition phase. The accident path into the transition phase with a bottled-up core situation and its energetics potential might thereby be avoided.