ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Milton H. Campbell, R. E. Tomlinson, Roy Nilson, R. F. Williams
Nuclear Technology | Volume 63 | Number 2 | November 1983 | Pages 228-243
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33283
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Under the sponsorship of the Electric Power Research Institute, a design concept has been developed for an integrated nuclear fuels reprocessing/recycle fuels fabrication plant which (a) could be authorized for detailed design in 1986, (b) would be capable of reprocessing 1500 tonnes of irradiated light water reactor (LWR) fuel [or lesser quantities of fast breeder reactor (FBR) fuel] per year and incorporating the recovered plutonium in FBR fuel, (c) could be operated safely, reliably, and economically, and (d) would illustrate a level of diversion resistance practicably attainable in a commercially sized and licensable facility. The design concept resulting from this study has been named SAFAR (an acronym for Safeguarded Fabrication and Reprocessing). The SAFAR concept includes a modified Purex process flow sheet coupled via a sol-gel conversion with a sphere-pac/sphere-cal process for fuel fabrication. The basic Purex flow sheet is modified so that plutonium moves through the system in essentially plug flow. This permits a rapid depletion of the plutonium inventory in the solvent extraction system, thereby making it possible to take a plant inventory in 24 h. In the sphere-pac process, the fuel is loaded into evacuated fuel rods as sintered oxide spheres. By concurrently loading three sizes of spheres with tube vibration, desired fuel densities (∼88%) can be obtained. This process permits the plutonium to be stored, transported, and added to the rods remotely. As an alternative, the sphere-cal process may be preferred for fuel fabrication. In the sphere-cal process, calcined oxide spheres are pressed into pellets and sintered. While this process is probably less desirable than sphere-pac from a safeguards viewpoint (more operator contact with plutonium would probably be required), the sphere-cal fuel might be viewed as more nearly comparable to conventional fuel with its well-established technical bases. The following features are specifically included in the SAFAR design concept to meet U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and/or International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards goals:1. Remote operation and equipment replacement techniques are used to limit personnel access to unencapsulated plutonium.2. In a plant designed to process 1500 tonnes of irradiated LWR fuel per year (∼13 000 kg of plutonium per year), the in-process inventory could be measured with an uncertainty < 6 kg Pu every 15 days with a minimal production loss. The long-term uncertainty in plutonium mass balances would be ∼0.35%.3. Material control and accountancy (MC&A) is accomplished through the use of a separate MC&A office. Pertinent measurements are made available electronically to the MC&A office concurrently (in parallel) with their availability to production personnel.4. The plant safeguards design is based on eight internal material balance areas and two item control areas.5. The plant layout is such that only specifically authorized personnel could enter that segment of the plant that contains plutonium.6. Under emergency conditions, personnel could retreat to a subgrade room where they would be protected from radiation, noxious chemicals, and/or terrorists. Exit would be via a guard station.