ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
RP3C Community of Practice’s fifth anniversary
In February, the Community of Practice (CoP) webinar series, hosted by the American Nuclear Society Standards Board’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policies Committee (RP3C), celebrated its fifth anniversary. Like so many online events, these CoPs brought people together at a time when interacting with others became challenging in early 2020. Since the kickoff CoP, which highlighted the impact that systems engineering has on the design of NuScale’s small modular reactor, the last Friday of most months has featured a new speaker leading a discussion on the use of risk-informed, performance-based (RIPB) thinking in the nuclear industry. Providing a venue to convene for people within ANS and those who found their way online by another route, CoPs are an opportunity for the community to receive answers to their burning questions about the subject at hand. With 50–100 active online participants most months, the conversation is always lively, and knowledge flows freely.
Ronald J. DiMelfi, John M. Kramer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 62 | Number 1 | July 1983 | Pages 51-61
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33231
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Characteristics of solid fuel fragmentation and energetic spallation during hypothetical accident transients are calculated. Fission gas, having migrated to the grain boundaries as intergranular bubbles, is assumed to provide the potential energy sufficient to fracture the fuel and induce fuel particle motion radially. Fuel cladding is assumed to maintain a radial constraint on the fuel until the cladding fails by melting. It is shown that the vapor pressure of elemental cesium contained in the fuel cladding gap can impose a compressive stress on the fuel sufficient to maintain a large quantity of intergranular fission gas trapped within equilibrium bubbles. On cladding melting and relaxation of constraint the extent of fuel fracture initiated at the overpressured bubbles is calculated. It is shown that expanding fission gas in the fractured grain boundaries is sufficient to eject fuel particles at substantial velocities. The results of calculations are consistent with experimental observations. The calculated compressive constraint of 3 to 5 MPa is in agreement with cladding failure stresses near the melting point and with those tensile stress levels necessary to cause observed cladding swelling. In further concurrence with the experiment, it was found that higher burnup fuel (≈9.9 at.% burnup) containing more fission gas was more likely to undergo energetic spallation, with larger quantities of fuel moving at greater speeds, than fuel irradiated to intermediate levels (4.7 at.% burnup). In the high burnup case, fuel particles of 0.5 to 1.0 mm in size were ejected radially at speeds >0.5 m/s. In the intermediate burnup case, smaller particles ≈ 0.2 mm in size move somewhat slower at speeds ≤0.4 m/s. A low burnup fuel (2.3 at.%) was calculated not to fragment and spall at all. Since the calculated vapor pressure of elemental cesium was used to account for the compressive constraint, the analysis requires the presence of cesium to predict spallation.