ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
John Jeffrey Stobbs, Antonio Matteo Taormina
Nuclear Technology | Volume 62 | Number 2 | August 1983 | Pages 139-144
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33212
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using a realistic evaluation of the likely develop-ment of commercial nuclear power, it is projected that some 428 000 MW(electric) of capacity will be in operation by the year 2000 in noncommunist countries. The availability of fissile material to support this program primarily hinges on the viability of two main industries, namely, the production of natural uranium and enrichment. The demand for natural uranium corresponding to this nuclear program is projected to amount to some 940 000 metric tons of uranium (MTU) through the end of the century. Currently defined reserves in the lower cost of recovery category (i.e., up to $80/kgU) amount to 1.75 million MTU so that such reserves can more than adequately cover needs. When the category of reasonably assured resources of some 550 000 MTU are also taken into account, needs can be covered well into the first half of the next century. There is currently a significant overcapacity for the mining and milling of uranium, and presently definable capacity should be able to meet the annual demand on a worldwide basis until the mid-1990s. However, buyer purchasing strategies and the level of prices will be important to ensure that production will remain or be made available when needed. The demand for enrichment services by the year 2000 will amount to some 47 000 metric tons of separative work units (MTSWU)/yr. Production capacity in operation, under construction, and firmly planned will have attained 45 400 MTSWU/yr by 1990. Further expansion of capacity is possible with very modest lead times. Only a very small increase in capacity would in principle be needed to cover demand in excess of the then existing capacity in the last two or three years of the 1990s. Demand could also be met by a very limited amount of preproduction from the excess capacity of previous years. Because of supply diversification considerations on the part of buyers, there will undoubtedly be further, though probably modest, expansion in supply capacity in the 1990s.