ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Antony E. Hughes, J. Angwin C. Marples, A. Marshall Stoneham
Nuclear Technology | Volume 61 | Number 3 | June 1983 | Pages 496-502
Technical Paper | New Directions in Nuclear Energy with Emphasis on Fuel Cycles / Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33174
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Most tests of the dissolution behavior of glasses quote the leach rate, often measured in flowing solutions. In the past, it has been pointed out that this may not be the rate-determining factor for the dissolution of glass in a radioactive waste repository because of the very small flow rate of water past the glass surface. Under these conditions, the rate of removal of elements from the glass would be controlled by the flow rate and the effective saturation solubility of the glass in the water, or, in stagnant conditions, by the rate of diffusion of species dissolved in the water away from the glass surface. Simple quantitative models are developed to provide a framework for the discussion of these effects, and they indicate that in cases of practical importance it is indeed solubility and either water access or diffusion that together limit the rate of dissolution of the glass. It can be concluded that effective leach rates in a repository will be below 10−7g.cm−2. day −1, a figure that in other studies has given a clear margin of long-term safety for radiological purposes.
