ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
K. Hilpert, R. Odoj, H. W. Nürnberg
Nuclear Technology | Volume 61 | Number 1 | April 1983 | Pages 71-77
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33144
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The potential of Al2O3/SiO2 additives for the retention of cesium in coated particles of high-temperature gas-cooled reactors is elucidated by fundamental studies of the system Cs2O−Al2O3−SiO2. Samples with nine different compositions were prepared by applying hydrothermal crystallization. Their phase composition was studied by x-ray diffraction extending the knowledge about the phase diagram. The vaporization of the samples was investigated with high-temperature mass spectrometry. From the partial pressures obtained for cesium, the efficiency of the various cesium aluminosilicate phases for the retention of cesium can be determined. The cesium pressures together with the phases observed in the samples provide the basis for cesium retention as a function of the optimum composition and quantity of the Al2O3/SiO2 additives. By comparing the cesium partial pressures over the various cesium aluminosilicates with those that are necessary for the formation of cesium lamellar compounds in reactor-grade graphite and pyrolytic graphite, it is found that lamellar compounds cannot be formed in coated particles if cesium aluminosilicates are formed.
