ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Thermal Hydraulics
The division provides a forum for focused technical dialogue on thermal hydraulic technology in the nuclear industry. Specifically, this will include heat transfer and fluid mechanics involved in the utilization of nuclear energy. It is intended to attract the highest quality of theoretical and experimental work to ANS, including research on basic phenomena and application to nuclear system design.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Norman P. Goldstein, William H. Todt, Alex D. Service
Nuclear Technology | Volume 60 | Number 3 | March 1983 | Pages 430-438
Technical Paper | LWR Control Materials—I and II / Technique | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33129
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Traditionally, air- and tissue-equivalent ion chambers have been used to determine the strength of radiation fields or the dose deposited in tissue, independent of the gamma-ray energy involved. Some applications, including those associated with U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.97, call for the use of metallic-walled chambers with such an energy-independent response requirement. We examined by means of calculations and measurements the effect of three different gas fills on this characteristic of a stainless steel/aluminum Westinghouse ion chamber. Details of the gamma ray and electron interactions in these chambers have been examined and they have shown that both secondary interactions of scattered gamma rays and interactions of the incident gamma rays directly with the chamber gas are important current-producing mechanisms in ion chambers with large electrode structures. This information, along with results concerning the effect of gas pressure on the energy loss of traversing electrons, is used to explain the calculated flat energy response from a 1-atm 95% N—5% He gas fill, the less flat response for a 10-atm fill of the same gas, and the strong energy dependence of 7.5 atm of xenon.