ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC session focuses on interagency collaboration
Attendees at last week’s 2026 Regulatory Information Conference, hosted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, saw extensive discussion of new reactor technologies, uprates, fusion, multiunit deployments, supply chain, and much more.
With the industry in a state of rapid evolution, there was much to discuss. Connected to all these topics was one central theme: the ongoing changes at the NRC. With massively shortened timelines, the ADVANCE Act and Executive Order 14300, and new interagency collaboration and authorization pathways in mind, speakers spent much of the RIC exploring what the road ahead looks like for the NRC.
Mitchel E. Cunningham, Donald D. Lanning
Nuclear Technology | Volume 60 | Number 3 | March 1983 | Pages 420-429
Technical Paper | LWR Control Materials—I and II / Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT83-A33128
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Irradiation data collected from test fuel rods that were identically built and operated may be used to define a range of normal performance for a specific fuel rod design. By comparing the data to computer code calculations, it is possible to define the range of applicability of fuel thermal performance computer codes. Data scatter for the centerline temperature from identical rods in several test assemblies decreases from the first power ascension to the third power ascension. Calculated uncertainty bands for the data (i.e., expected variability for the data assuming dimensional tolerances, material property uncertainties, and power uncertainties) are found to be larger than the data scatter. The FRAPCON-2 temperature calculations agree with temperature data from helium-filled rods; however, the code does not match beginning-of-life temperatures from a xenon-filled rod. However, the code results agreed with data obtained from the xenon-filled rod at higher burnup, thus indicating that the code adequately calculates fuel temperatures for fission gas-filled rods later in life.