ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Christopher J. Blesch, F. A. Kulacki, R. N. Christensen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 1 | October 1982 | Pages 104-118
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33057
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Integral methods have been applied to the prediction of the far field thermal impact of a nuclear waste repository. The heat balance integral (HBI) has been applied to a semi-infinite layered domain in which the repository is represented by an infinite plane beneath either one or two sublayers. Calculations for pressurized water reactor spent fuel with an initial thermal loading of 60 kW/acre are carried out for various stratigraphies and overburden compositions. Thermophysical properties of all geologic media are assumed independent of temperature, but thermal conductivities are varied to include upper and lower bounds, as well as generic values. The results demonstrate that thermophysical properties of the overburden have the most important influence on temperature distributions and peak temperature at any position above the repository. Where a comparison to exact or numerical solutions is possible, the HBI predicts maximum temperature increases in the overburden to within 10%. Heat fluxes to the earth’s surface are found to be relatively insensitive to overburden composition. For dome salt, the surface heat flux is 1.2 to 2.7% of the initial thermal loading over 105 yr. This variation corresponds to about a threefold variation in the effective thermal conductivity of the overburden. Similarly, low percentages of thermal loading reach the surface for bedded salt, granite, basalt, or shale. In any case, the present results provide upper bound estimates on both repository temperature and surface heat flux.