ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
RP3C Community of Practice’s fifth anniversary
In February, the Community of Practice (CoP) webinar series, hosted by the American Nuclear Society Standards Board’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policies Committee (RP3C), celebrated its fifth anniversary. Like so many online events, these CoPs brought people together at a time when interacting with others became challenging in early 2020. Since the kickoff CoP, which highlighted the impact that systems engineering has on the design of NuScale’s small modular reactor, the last Friday of most months has featured a new speaker leading a discussion on the use of risk-informed, performance-based (RIPB) thinking in the nuclear industry. Providing a venue to convene for people within ANS and those who found their way online by another route, CoPs are an opportunity for the community to receive answers to their burning questions about the subject at hand. With 50–100 active online participants most months, the conversation is always lively, and knowledge flows freely.
Edgar Kiefhaber
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 3 | December 1982 | Pages 483-493
Technical Paper | The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Radioactive Waste Management / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33006
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Steam ingress into a gas-cooled fast reactor (GCFR) core may lead to reactivity effects that are undesirable from the point of view of reactor safety. Unfortunately, the amount of reactivity increase caused by a certain steam concentration is usually subject to considerable uncertainty, as has become evident by occasional comparisons between various laboratories for specific examples. Therefore, some time ago, a series of intentionally simple benchmarks were proposed in order to study in a systematic way the calculational uncertainty of the steam ingress reactivity arising essentially from differences in the nuclear data basis used at various laboratories. The analysis of corresponding results provided by laboratories in France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States reveals that there still exist appreciable deviations in the predicted steam ingress reactivity effect. Due to the extensive cancellation of positive and negative contributions to this reactivity effect, the resulting net value is extremely sensitive to deviations in the nuclear data and calculational methods. Typical discrepancies for the calculated steam ingress reactivity observed within the framework of an international intercomparison are described, leading to the conclusion that further improvements in the nuclear data basis are desirable and the development and application of fairly refined calculational methods is mandatory to be able to predict the corresponding effect with sufficient reliability for related power reactor designs. In addition, measurements of equivalent reactivity effects should be continued in different critical assemblies to provide a broader experimental basis for the verification of the calculational tools. If further analytical work could be pursued, the Argonne National Laboratory experiment on the GCFR Phase II Steam Entry Effect might be the appropriate object to be studied and analyzed in detail, e.g., by a similar intercomparison effort, especially if the discrepancies existing at present in nuclear data bases could be removed or diminished to a tolerable level. Reasonable progress in these areas would increase the confidence attributed to calculations of the reactivity effect of the assumed entry of hydrogeneous material into the core of a fast power reactor.