ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
RP3C Community of Practice’s fifth anniversary
In February, the Community of Practice (CoP) webinar series, hosted by the American Nuclear Society Standards Board’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policies Committee (RP3C), celebrated its fifth anniversary. Like so many online events, these CoPs brought people together at a time when interacting with others became challenging in early 2020. Since the kickoff CoP, which highlighted the impact that systems engineering has on the design of NuScale’s small modular reactor, the last Friday of most months has featured a new speaker leading a discussion on the use of risk-informed, performance-based (RIPB) thinking in the nuclear industry. Providing a venue to convene for people within ANS and those who found their way online by another route, CoPs are an opportunity for the community to receive answers to their burning questions about the subject at hand. With 50–100 active online participants most months, the conversation is always lively, and knowledge flows freely.
Alan P. Main, Bryce L. Shriver
Nuclear Technology | Volume 59 | Number 3 | December 1982 | Pages 456-462
Technical PaperTechnical Paper | The Backfill as an Engineered Barrier for Radioactive Waste Management / Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A33003
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A model for predicting the annealing response of A553-B weld materials has been developed. This model assumes that the irradiation-induced shifts in the nil ductility transition temperature (ΔNDTT) and Charpy upper shelf energy (ΔUSE) are a result of the introduction of three types of defects into the alloy. The recovery of ΔNDTT and ΔUSE depends on the concentration of each defect remaining after the annealing treatment. The three defect types, including their diffusion constants, are assumed to be the same for all A533-B welds. However, the contribution of each defect type to ΔNDTT and ΔUSE depends on the chemical composition of the material and possibly the neutron fluence. Copper, nickel, manganese, and chromium were found to correlate with ΔNDTT, while sulfur and phosphorus appeared to correlate with ΔUSE. Once the relative contribution of each defect type is known, the recovery of ΔNDTT and ΔUSE is predicted based on diffusion calculations. Both the annealing temperature and time are accounted for in the calculations. The final model was compared with experimental data on three materials tested by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and two materials tested by the Naval Research Laboratory. The model accurately predicted the recovery of ΔNDTT for all five materials annealed at 343°C (650°F) to 454°C (850°F) for 24 to 336 h. The predicted recovery of ΔUSE was not as accurate as that of ΔNDTT.