ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Meyer Steinberg, James R. Powell, Hiroshi Takahashi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 58 | Number 3 | September 1982 | Pages 437-446
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32979
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Received October 9, 1981 Accepted for Publication March 18, 1982 The development of a nuclear fission fuel cycle is proposed that eliminates all the radioactive fission product (FP) waste effluent and the need for geological age high-level waste storage and provides a longterm supply of fissile fuel for a light water reactor (LWR) economy. The fuel cycle consists of reprocessing LWR spent fuel (1 to 2 yr old) to remove the stable nonradioactive FPs (NRFPs) (e.g., lanthanides, etc.) and short-lived FPs (SLFP) (e.g., half-lives of <1 to 2 yr) and returning, in dilute form, the long-lived FPs (LLFPs) (e.g., 30-yr half-life cesium and strontium, 10-yr krypton, and 16 X106-yr iodine) and the transuranics (TUs) (e.g., plutonium, americium, curium, and neptunium) to be refabricated into fresh fuel elements. Makeup fertile and fissile fuel (FF) are to be supplied through the use of the spallator (linear accelerator spallation-target fuel producer). The reprocessing of LWR fuel elements is to be performed by means of the chelox process, which consists of chopping and leaching with an organic chelating reagent (β-diketonate) and distillation of the organo-metallic compounds formed for purposes of separating and partitioning the FPs. The stable NRFPs and SLFPs are allowed to decay to background in 10 to 20 yr for final disposal to the environment. The fertile material (FM) (e.g., 238U) and TUs are returned to be reincorporated into LWR fuel elements. The even mass-numbered TUs are efficiently converted to odd mass-numbered FF in the reactor, which then fissions to produce thermal energy and FPs in the LWR. The TUs have high thermal neutron cross sections and are therefore efficiently converted in the thermal LWR. The LLFPs (e.g., cesium, strontium, krypton, and iodine) are recycled in the fuel cycle to decay and become transmuted both in the spallator and the LWR to SLFP and stable NRFP products. Decay is the major mode of transmutation of the LLFPs because of their small thermal neutron cross sections. Some neutron transmutation does occur and shortens the storage times for the LLFPs. In this manner, long-term geological age storage of FP waste is avoided and the need for a new fast breeder reactor economy is no longer a necessity by the utility power industry. The APEX fuel cycle can be beneficially applied to the Th/233U cycle as well as the described U/239Pu cycle. A number of development efforts will be required to bring this system into production; however, no new basic scientific or technical proof-of-principle is needed.