ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Sridhar Komarneni, Rustum Roy
Nuclear Technology | Volume 56 | Number 3 | March 1982 | Pages 575-579
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32916
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The following potential backfill materials have been studied: phillipsite, clinoptilolite, mordenite, montmorillonites, vermiculites, chlorite, kaolinite, labradorite, and shales. Each of these was hydrothermally reacted with Cs2MoO4, a possible cesium phase in spent fuel elements, in the presence of a bittern brine at 200°C for two months under a confining pressure of 300 bars. Analyses of the product solutions indicated that montmorillonites, vermiculites, and zeolites fixed (as determined by resistance to K+ washing) the greatest fractions of the added cesium while other minerals, labradorite, and shales fixed only about 10% of the added cesium. For example, montmorillonite from Arizona and phillipsite from California fixed 47 and 50%, respectively, of the cesium added. X-ray diffraction analysis of the solid products revealed that cesium was fixed in the interlayers of montmorillonite as indicated by the collapse of the c-spacing from 15.5 to 12.1 A. Cesium interaction with clinoptilolite and mordenite zeolites did not result in their alteration or in any new cesium minerals as observed by x-ray diffraction. The cesium aluminosilicate mineral, pollucite, was detected only with phillipsite-cesium interactions in brine unlike in the hydrothermal interaction of these materials with Cs2MoO4 in deionized water where the presence of pollucite was found earlier to be pervasive. Powellite, CaMoO4, was the only new phase found in all these interactions by x-ray diffraction which resulted from the combination of calcium from brine with molybdenum from Cs2MoO4. Montmorillonites among clay minerals and zeolites such as clinoptilolite and mordenite seem to be the best backfill materials in salt based on these studies and based on our earlier studies of mineral stability under repository conditions.