ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Who’s in the running for DOE Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses?
Today is the Department of Energy’s deadline for states to respond to a request for information on proposed Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. Issued on January 28, the RFI marks the first step toward potentially establishing voluntary federal-state partnerships designed to build a coherent, end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle strategy for the country, including waste management, according to the DOE.
D. D. Lanning
Nuclear Technology | Volume 56 | Number 3 | March 1982 | Pages 565-574
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32915
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thermally induced cracking of the UO2 fuel pellets undoubtedly results in some reduction of the effective fuel thermal conductivity, relative to that for solid UO2. This effect may be approximated by appropriately chosen “crack factors” that reduce the solid-UO2 thermal conductivity. We demonstrate that the assumption of reduced fuel conductivity always results in a reduction of the fuel stored energy that is inferred from fuel centerline temperature data. This reduction occurs whether the crack factors are introduced as simple constants or as functions of radial position within the fuel pellet. If fuel performance computer codes remain “tuned” to the current body of centerline temperature data, those codes will predict lower fuel stored energy when fuel cracking is taken into account regardless of the modeling assumptions invoked. Accounting for fuel cracking should lead to a reduction in calculated peak cladding temperatures obtained in some loss-of-coolant accident simulations.