Multi-Attribute Decision Theory is applied to rank 11 alternative routes to nuclear proliferation in order of difficulty in acquiring nuclear weapons by nonnuclear countries. The method is based on reducing the various variables affecting the decision to a single function providing a measure for the proliferation route. The results indicate that the most difficult route to obtain atomic weapons is through nuclear power reactors, specifically the liquid-metal fast breeder reactor, heavy water Canada deuterium uranium reactor, and light water reactors such as boiling water and pressurized water reactors. The easiest routes are supercritical centrifuge isotope separation, laser isotope separation, and research reactor. However, nonnuclear routes available that result in substantial damage to life and property are easier than any nuclear route.

REFERENCES

  1. PAUL WYATT and HOWARD BRAUN, “Evaluation of Alternative Proliferation Routes,” Westinghouse Electric Corporation (May 1977).
  2. R. SCHLAIFER, Analysis of Decisions Under Uncertainty, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1969).
  3. R. L. KEENEY, “Multiple Utility Functions,” Oper. Res., 22, 1, 101 (1974).
  4. R. L. KEENEY, “A Decision Analysis with Multiple Objectives: The Mexico City Airport,” Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci., 4, 1, 101 (1973).
  5. H. RAIFFA, Decision Analysis, Introductory Lectures on Choice Under Uncertainty, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Massachusetts (1970).
  6. SHAHID AHMED and A. A. HUSSEINY, “Selection of Energy Systems Based on Decision Analysis of Various Attributes,” Proc. Symp. Simulation, Modeling, and Decision in Energy Systems, Montreal, Canada, June 1–2, 1978.
  7. E. F. WOOD, “Applying Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Evaluation of Tisza River Basin Development Plans,” International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis Conf., Vol. 2, Austria, 1976, International Institute of Applied Systems.
  8. SHAHID AHMED and A. A. HUSSEINY, “A Formal Methodology for Acceptability Analysis of Alternate Sites for Nuclear Power Stations,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 51, 361 (1979).
  9. SHAHID AHMED and A. A. HUSSEINY, “A Multivariate-Utility Approach for Selection of Energy Sources,” Energy, 3, 669 (1978).
  10. SHAHID AHMED and A. A. HUSSEINY, “Accommodation of Public Preference in Selection of Energy Alternatives,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 30, 13 (1978).
  11. J. J. TURNAGE and A. A. HUSSEINY, “Public Participation in Siting Decisions,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 34, 689 (1980).