ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Investment bill would provide funding options for energy projects
Coons
Moran
The bipartisan Financing Our Futures Act, which expands certain financing tools to all types of energy resources and infrastructure projects, was reintroduced to the U.S. Senate on February 20 by Sens. Jerry Moran (R., Kan.) and Chris Coons (D., Del.).
Via amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, the legislation would allow advanced nuclear energy projects to form as master limited partnerships (MLPs), a tax structure currently available only to traditional energy projects.
An MLP is a business structure that is taxed as a partnership but the ownership interests of which are traded like corporate stock on a market. Until the Internal Revenue Code is amended, MLPs will continue to be available only to investors in energy portfolios for oil, natural gas, coal extraction, and pipeline projects that derive at least 90 percent of their income from these sources. This change would take effect on January 1, 2026.
Volker Drüke, Detlef Filges, Rahim Nabbi, Ralf D. Neef, Norbert Paul, Hartwig Schaal
Nuclear Technology | Volume 55 | Number 3 | December 1981 | Pages 549-564
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32798
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Investigation of the initial core poisoning of the pebble bed high temperature reactor has been made by experiments and by checking computations. In following the example of the thorium high-temperature reactor THTR-300, THTR absorber elements poisoned with hafnium-boron were added to the THTR fuel and graphite elements of the KAHTER core. Three different hafnium-boron poisoned core loadings, corresponding to 2.7, 5.3, and 8% reactivity compensation, were used in the experiments. For purposes of comparison, two cores poisoned exclusively with boron were also studied. The poisoning of these cores corresponds to 2.7 and 8% reactivity compensation, respectively. The experiments and checking computations should serve to test the accuracy of the theoretical models and data sets in modeling the reactivity effects of absorber poisoned elements in the THTR. In particular, the applicability of the nuclear data of hafnium and the treatment of resonance calculations should be verified. In addition to determining critical masses and keff, special emphasis was placed in the experiments on the exact determination of all reactivity effects. In some cases, repeated loading of a configuration also provided a measure of the reproducibility of keff. The experiments were checked computationally using the GAMTEREX code package and the program system RSYST. These two computation packages contain different data bases, although the hafnium data are identical, and the computing models differ in certain phases of the calculations. Both code systems compute keff values to within the present accuracy requirements, whereas the program system RSYST gives better agreement with experimental measurements.