ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
A wave of new U.S.-U.K. deals ahead of Trump’s state visit
President Trump will arrive in the United Kingdom this week for a state visit that promises to include the usual pomp and ceremony alongside the signing of a landmark new agreement on U.S.-U.K. nuclear collaboration.
A. R. Shepherd, J. N. Anno
Nuclear Technology | Volume 52 | Number 3 | March 1981 | Pages 435-436
Technical Note | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32719
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Radiation-induced outgassing was measured for several metals exposed to 60Co gamma radiation. The metals, in the form of tubes or rods, were placed in a Type 304 stainless-steel vacuum system. It was determined that the array of the pins (either square or hexagonal) did not significantly affect the results. The measurements for Type 304 stainless steel varied from (1.42 ± 1.75) × 10−9 (Pa - ℓ)/(cm2 ·s) per Mrad/h for a surface-to-volume (S/V) ratio of 8.64 cm−1 to (9.58 ± 3.81) ×10−10(pa - ℓ)/(cm2·s) for an S/V ratio of 3.08 cm−1. For Type 316 stainless steel, the determination was (1.18 ± 0.49) × 10−9 (pa - ℓ)/(cm2·s) per Mrad/h, for aluminum the value was (6.24 ± 17.2) × 10−10 and for carbon (2.28 ± 0.59) × 10−9 (pa - ℓ.)/(cm2·s) per Mrad/h. The determinations were made by comparing the rate-of-rise pressure curves with and without gamma radiation, and large errors resulted when the differences were small.