ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Ronald W. King, Erwin C. Filewicz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 52 | Number 1 | January 1981 | Pages 32-42
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32687
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) is an unmoderated, sodium-cooled reactor with a design power level of 62.5 MW(thermal). The design uses a submerged pool concept in which the reactor and fuel handling components are contained in a primary tank filled with sodium. The in-tank fuel handling is done remotely with no visual contact of the fuel subassemblies or the in-tank portion of the fuel handling equipment. The fuel handling operations, therefore, depend on precise, predictable positioning of all equipment and subassemblies. In July 1978, during normal fuel handling operations, it was discovered that one of the subassemblies in the in-tank storage basket for reactor subassemblies was not in the proper position to be handled with the subassembly transfer arm. Months of diagnostic evaluation of the actual position and shape of the subassembly resulted in a full-size mockup of the equipment and of the subassembly involved. The diagnostic measurements were duplicated with the mockup, a special system for retrieving the subassembly was designed and built, and a procedure was prepared. Using the mockup, the special equipment and procedure were thoroughly tested, modified, and retested. The subassembly was retrieved from the storage basket and primary tank on May 11, 1979, with no major difficulties. During the time between the discovery of the problem and the retrieval of the sub-assembly, EBR-II reactor operations continued as normal except for minor inconveniences during fuel handling operations because of the position of the damaged subassembly. The overall success of this project gave confidence that abnormal situations of this type in a sodium-cooled, pot-type reactor can be handled, without visual contact, through careful planning and preparation.