ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Mohamed S. El-Genk, Richard L. Moore
Nuclear Technology | Volume 53 | Number 3 | June 1981 | Pages 354-373
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel Cycle Education Module / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32644
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The safe containment of molten core debris following a hypothetical meltdown accident in a light water reactor depends on the post-accident distribution and freezing of the debris on cold core structures. A one-dimensional physical model was developed to study the transient freezing of the molten debris on the inner surface of the test shroud wall in a severe, reactivity initiated accident in-pile experiment, and to assess the potential for wall melting upon being contacted by the molten debris. The conditions of finite wall thickness, convective cooling at the wall outer surface, radiative cooling of the debris, temperature-dependent thermophysical properties, and internal heat generation in the debris were considered. It is concluded that the shroud wall should not melt upon contact by the molten debris, which agreed with the experimental observations, because of the initial low temperature of the wall (538 K) and of the molten debris (∼3500 K) at the time of contact. Should wall melting occur, however, the wall molten layer would be unstable because of the small thickness of the wall and the continuous cooling at the wall outer surface by coolant bypass flow. The agreement between the calculations and experimental results indicated that considering the molten debris during the freezing process as a homogeneous mixture of the constituents (UO2 and Zircaloy) was a reasonable assumption.