ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Dennis L. Berry
Nuclear Technology | Volume 53 | Number 2 | May 1981 | Pages 204-216
Technical Paper | Realistic Estimates of the Consequences of Nuclear Accident / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32625
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A review of the analysis techniques currently available for evaluating the adequacy of fire barriers revealed several shortcomings that may render these techniques inappropriate for nuclear power plant applications.In particular, current fire barrier analysis methods are either cumbersome or unconservative. An alternative to these methods was developed using a knowledge of the influences on fire severity of fuel load, room size, and available air for combustion. By performing a parametric heat balance for a room, temperature changes versus time were calculated as a function of fuel load, room size, and airflow rate. When combined with time-temperature criteria used in fire barrier testing, the parametric heat balance equations defined those combinations of fuel load and airflow for which barriers can be expected to survive under the most severe fire conditions. The results of this calculational model were simplified into several plots for convenience of analysis. These plots were used to demonstrate the analysis technique with parameters taken from several actual power plant areas.