ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
R. R. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 53 | Number 2 | May 1981 | Pages 147-154
Technical Paper | Realistic Estimates of the Consequences of Nuclear Accident / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT81-A32619
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three series of destructive reactor experiments were examined from the viewpoint of fission product dispersal to the environment and fission product retention in the fuel, coolant, and structural surroundings.The experiments included the following: the Boiling Reactor Experiment (BORAX-I), 1954; Special Power Excursion Reactor Test (SPERT-I), 1962; and Systems for Nuclear Auxiliary Power Transient Reactor test series (SNAPTRAN) 2/10A-3, 1964; and SNAPTRAN-2, 1966. All but SNAPTRAN-2 were carried out in a water medium. Particular emphasis was placed on the release behavior of iodine fission products since it is these that have the highest radiological effectiveness. The results of the studies showed that when fuel is damaged in a water medium essentially all of the radioiodine is retained in the water. Essentially none was volatilized and dispersed to the atmosphere. In the case of fuel damage in an air medium (SNAPTRAN-2), 70% of the radioiodine was released to the atmosphere. Release fractions for the noble gas fission products were also evaluated. These ranged from a low of 3 to 4% in SNAPTRAN-2/10A-3 (water medium) to a high of 75% in SNAPTRAN-2 (air medium). These data, along with those for radioiodine, confirm the effectiveness of water as a medium for limiting the release of fission products to the environment from damaged fuel.
