ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Gary S. Hoovler, M. Neil Baldwin, Ray L. Eng, Fred G. Welfare
Nuclear Technology | Volume 51 | Number 2 | December 1980 | Pages 217-237
Technical Paper | Argonne National Laboratory Specialists’ Workshop on Basic Research Needs for Nuclear Waste Management / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32604
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Close-packed storage of light water reactor (LWR) fuel assemblies is needed to expand the capacity of existing underwater storage pools. This increased capacity is required to store the large volume of spent fuel that arises from prolonged on-site storage. To provide benchmark criticality data in support of this effort, an experimental program sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy was undertaken. Low-enriched UO2 fuel pins in a water-moderated lattice were used to construct 20 critical assemblies that simulated a variety of close-packed LWR fuel storage configurations. The critical assemblies consisted of nine LWR-type fuel assemblies (clusters) grouped in a radially reflected 3×3 array. Both the spacing and material between the fuel clusters were varied to provide numerous critical configurations. All pertinent data for each critical assembly are documented in sufficient detail to validate calculational methods according to the American National Standards Institute standard N16.9-1975. Criticality calculations using the Monte Carlo code KENO IV were performed for comparison with the experimental data. The comparison shows that the calculational model underestimates keff when separation between fuel clusters is >1 pin pitch (1.64 cm), and that the degree of underestimation increases as the spacing widens.