ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
American Fuel Resources requests license for N.M. uranium deconversion plant
American Fuel Resources, a provider a nuclear fuel cycle solutions headquartered in Spokane, Wash., has submitted an application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requesting transfer of a materials license from Idaho-based radioisotope manufacturer International Isotopes for a depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF6) deconversion plant in Lea County, N.M.
Otto Demel
Nuclear Technology | Volume 48 | Number 3 | May 1980 | Pages 298-302
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32476
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A ternary 15 Cr—35 Ni—50 Fe alloy and three versions of the same base doped with niobium, titanium, or molybdenum were exposed in the temperature range from 700 to 1000°C to simulated high temperature reactor helium in two corrosion experiments that differed mainly in moisture content at the High Temperature Materials Programme in Wimborne, United Kingdom. The water level in Run B was about ten times higher than in the dryer Run A. As expected, oxides that formed during exposure in the oxidizing atmosphere of Run B were generally thicker. Thickness and structural appearance of the oxides varied between the four alloys in both runs. In electron probe microanalysis studies the oxides were found to be virtually pure chromium oxides containing no significant amounts of the additives. It is inferred that variations in thickness and structural appearance of the oxides are caused by differences in kinetics of chromium oxidation, depending on the additives.