ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Bernard L. Cohen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 48 | Number 1 | April 1980 | Pages 63-69
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32448
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The several water intrusion scenario studies in the recent literature are all quite similar and may be easily understood if used to estimate the total number of eventual cancers per unit of energy generated, including their sensitivity to input parameters. However, these studies are grossly overpessimistic in several aspects of the problem, especially in using leach rate data from highly unrealistic experimental situations, and in ignoring geochemical considerations in both leaching and in transport. It is concluded that it is reasonable to expect removal and transport for an atom of buried waste to be similar to that for an atom of average rock. Under that assumption, the leach rate can be estimated from the chemical compositions of rock and of groundwater, coupled with the water flow through aquifers. The result (excluding 238U) is 0.0008 eventual cancer/GW(electric)-yr. This treatment would be invalidated if the waste were released through fractures in the rock induced by the emplacement operations or by heat. If such fractures cannot be discounted, total reliance must be on leach resistance.