ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
TerraPower begins U.K. regulatory approval process
Seattle-based TerraPower signaled its interest this week in building its Natrium small modular reactor in the United Kingdom, the company announced.
TerraPower sent a letter to the U.K.’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, formally establishing its intention to enter the U.K. generic design assessment (GDA) process. This is TerraPower’s first step in deployment of its Natrium technology—a 345-MW sodium fast reactor coupled with a molten salt energy storage unit—on the international stage.
J. E. Till, H. R. Meyer, L. E. Morse, W. D. Bond, E. S. Bomar, V. J. Tennery
Nuclear Technology | Volume 48 | Number 1 | April 1980 | Pages 54-62
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32447
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The radiological dose associated with the use of (Th,U) carbide fuel in the core and thorium carbide in the blankets of a fast breeder reactor (FBR) has been investigated. Analysis of the estimated dose due to reprocessing spent (Th,U) carbide fuel allows a direct comparison between the radiological consequences of the use of this fuel versus other candidates such as (U,Pu) oxide or carbide. This study employed methodologies similar to those used in previous assessments of advanced FBR fuels. Results are calculated in terms of the potential dose commitment to a maximally exposed individual and to the general population living within 80 km of the operating plant. Tritium is found to be the principal contributor to dose commitment to total body for both the individual and the general population. Also contributing significantly to the dose are 14C, 137Cs, and 232U. Maximum individual dose is 3.1 mrem (total body), while dose to total body for the population is found to be 39 man-rem per 50 GW(electric)-yr. A parametric analysis was conducted to determine the effect on dose of varying the 232U content from 10 to 5000 ppm. The study showed that at 5000 ppm 232U/U and with no additional modification in the effluent treatment system, dose to the total body of a maximally exposed individual is increased by a factor of 1.4, from 2.8 to 4.0 mrem. Another analysis was conducted to determine the effect of increasing the reprocessing plant confinement factor for 3H from 1 to 100. This exercise was prompted by recent experimental data suggesting that greater quantities of 3H may be produced in FBRs than were previously anticipated. It was found that a confinement factor of 100 for 3H reduces the dose to total body (for individuals and populations) by a factor of ∼3. It is concluded that reprocessing of (Th,U) carbide fuel for FBRs should meet applicable standards in terms of radiological impact during routine operations. In this context, little difference is seen to exist between the (Th,U) carbide fuels and earlier results for (U,Pu) oxide and carbide fuels,
