ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
E. J. Allen, S. R. McNeany
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 2 | February 1980 | Pages 363-377
Technical Paper | Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32439
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Assay and analysis procedures were developed for nondestructive fissile isotopic measurement of mixed 233U-235U fuel samples. For 233U, the number of delayed neutrons released per fission is about half that for 235U, although the number of prompt neutrons is approximately the same. By separately counting prompt and delayed neutrons released by a sample exposed to neutron irradiation, the amounts of 233U and 235U present in the sample can be determined. Equations of delayed and prompt neutron counts versus 233U and 235U contents are solved simultaneously for the 233U and 235U contents of a sample. Eleven samples containing mixtures of 233U and 235U from no 233U to nearly 100% were prepared and assayed in prompt and delayed neutron assay devices. Constants for calibration equations were fitted to data from nine of the samples. The maximum differences between counts calculated by the calibration equations and measured counts were 2.3% for delayed neutrons and 1.2% for prompt neutrons, indicating a good selection of the form for the calibration equations. The two remaining samples were treated as unknown, and the uranium contents of these samples were determined by simultaneously solving the two calibration equations. The maximum difference between measured 233U or 235U content and actual content for either sample was 1.5%.