ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
S. R. Bierman, B. M. Durst, E. D. Clayton
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 1 | January 1980 | Pages 51-58
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32411
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of criticality experiments with 2.35 and 4.31 wt% 235U enriched UO2 rods in water has provided well-defined benchmark-type data showing that both depleted uranium and lead reflecting walls, submerged in the water reflector, are better neutron reflectors than water alone. For each fuel enrichment, the critical separation between three subcritical, near optimally moderated fuel clusters was observed to increase as either 77-mm-thick depleted uranium or 102-mm-thick lead reflecting walls were moved toward the fuel The maximum reactivity effect was observed for the depleted uranium with ∼20 mm of water between the reflecting walls and the fuel region, whereas for the lead, a maximum effect was obtained with essentially no water between the reflecting walls and the fuel region. This maximum reactivity effect was observed to occur at the same spatial separation between the fuel and reflecting walls for both fuel enrichments. However, the measurements indicated that the magnitude of this phenomenon is dependent on the 235U enrichment of the fuel The lead reflecting walls increased the critical separation between fuel clusters a maximum of 67% for the 2.35 wt% 235U enriched fuel and at least 152% for the 4.31 wt% enriched fuel Similar results were observed with the depleted uranium reflecting walls.