ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Keigo Mio, Tetsuo Kurashige, Toshiso Kosako
Nuclear Technology | Volume 136 | Number 1 | October 2001 | Pages 63-75
Technical Paper | Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3229
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The shielding effect for neutrons and gamma rays provided by a louver-type steel structure inserted into the second leg of a concrete duct was measured and analyzed. The louver is an assembly of steel plates that are stacked at the same interval to reduce the radiation streaming while keeping air flowing through the duct. The experiment was carried out at the Japan Research Reactor-4 (JRR4) using a large concrete duct that was temporarily installed for this experiment.Experimental data for the shielding effect of the louver were obtained through the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (CaSO4 and BeO) and an ionization chamber for the gamma dose. A rem counter was used to obtain neutron dose, while a solid-state track detector was used for fast neutron dose. Finally, indium activation foil was used to obtain the thermal neutron flux. A NaI(Tl) scintillation spectrometer was used for the measurement of gamma rays from activated foil.The measured data were compared to that derived from numerical analyses. Numerical analyses included the use of the conventional Sn transport code DOT3.5, the Monte Carlo code MCNP4A, and calculations with empirical formulas.MCNP4A provided satisfactory estimates for all cases. If proper calculations were carried out, then DOT3.5 provided acceptable estimates except for the thermal neutrons in spite of the limitations of the code's two-dimensional geometrical modeling. Calculations by hand using simple empirical formulas with modifications, like that for the angular flux correction, also could provide fairly accurate estimates.