ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
H. F. MacDonald, S. Nair
Nuclear Technology | Volume 42 | Number 3 | March 1979 | Pages 353-361
Technical Note | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Central Electricity Generating Board reactor inventory code RICE has been used to calculate the buildup of activity and radioactive emissions for a range of alternative fuel cycles based on a conceptual high-temperature gas-cooled reactor design. The fuels included in this study were a conventional 235U-enriched oxide fuel, a mixed PuO2/UO2 fuel employing pressurized water reactor plutonium, and both low- and high-enrichment mixed 235UO2/ThO2 fuels. The results have been used to quantify the radiological protection implications of these fuel cycles in terms of fuel handling and reprocessing waste management. Some of the thorium fuels investigated have distinct advantages compared with those employing recycled plutonium in terms of both reduced neutron dose rates and long-term alpha decay heating. However, this is at the expense of enhanced gamma dose rates during the fabrication and handling of fresh 233U fuels. These gamma emissions build up with time and require rapid fabrication and return of fuel to the reactor following irradiated fuel reprocessing. The hazards associated with fuel reprocessing wastes are dominated by fission product isotopes over the first few centuries and are similar for U/Pu and thorium fuel cycles. The reduced hazards associated with the actinide component of thorium fuels are only advantageous in waste management schemes involving separate treatment of fission products and actinides.