ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
GAO: Clarification of HLW definition could save DOE billions
A clearer definition of what constitutes high-level radioactive waste could save the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management “tens of billions of dollars” in waste management costs and accelerate its cleanup schedule by decades, according to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
DOE-EM’s efforts to manage waste resulting from legacy spent nuclear fuel reprocessing have been hindered for decades by the ambiguity of the statutory definition of HLW as laid out in the Atomic Energy Act and Nuclear Waste Policy Act, the report states. While admitting that the DOE has taken steps to overcome this ambiguity, the GAO says that the department has not fully evaluated all available opportunities to treat and dispose of waste more economically as either transuranic or low-level radioactive waste.
H. F. MacDonald, S. Nair
Nuclear Technology | Volume 42 | Number 3 | March 1979 | Pages 353-361
Technical Note | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Central Electricity Generating Board reactor inventory code RICE has been used to calculate the buildup of activity and radioactive emissions for a range of alternative fuel cycles based on a conceptual high-temperature gas-cooled reactor design. The fuels included in this study were a conventional 235U-enriched oxide fuel, a mixed PuO2/UO2 fuel employing pressurized water reactor plutonium, and both low- and high-enrichment mixed 235UO2/ThO2 fuels. The results have been used to quantify the radiological protection implications of these fuel cycles in terms of fuel handling and reprocessing waste management. Some of the thorium fuels investigated have distinct advantages compared with those employing recycled plutonium in terms of both reduced neutron dose rates and long-term alpha decay heating. However, this is at the expense of enhanced gamma dose rates during the fabrication and handling of fresh 233U fuels. These gamma emissions build up with time and require rapid fabrication and return of fuel to the reactor following irradiated fuel reprocessing. The hazards associated with fuel reprocessing wastes are dominated by fission product isotopes over the first few centuries and are similar for U/Pu and thorium fuel cycles. The reduced hazards associated with the actinide component of thorium fuels are only advantageous in waste management schemes involving separate treatment of fission products and actinides.