ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Atul A. Karve, Paul J. Turinsky
Nuclear Technology | Volume 135 | Number 3 | September 2001 | Pages 241-251
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3219
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As part of the continuing development of the boiling water reactor in-core fuel management optimization code FORMOSA-B, the cold shutdown margin (SDM) constraint evaluator has been improved. The SDM evaluator in FORMOSA-B had been a first-order accurate Rayleigh quotient variational technique. It was deemed unreliable for difficult perturbed loading patterns (LPs) and thus was replaced by a high-fidelity, robust, computationally efficient evaluator. The new model is based on the solution of the one-group diffusion equation using approximate albedo boundary conditions for a three-dimensional, variable axial node, 10 × 10 assembly subregion around the stuck rod location. The fidelity and robustness of the model are first demonstrated by performing calculations on difficult perturbed LPs and for different plant cores. It is shown that the SDM reactivity is estimated within 40 pcm for the highest worth rod and that the speedup factors are 50 to 100 for small cores (and even more for larger cores) in comparison to the full-core three-dimensional simulations. Next, the successful implementation of the model in imposing the SDM constraint for FORMOSA-B's adaptive simulated annealing (SA)-based optimization strategy is presented. The results demonstrate SA's ability to remove large SDM violations (>700 pcm) along with thermal margin and critical flow constraint violations. Finally, the importance of having the SDM constraint on during optimization is shown by comparing results with a simulation in which the constraint is off.