ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
C. K. Mathews, H. C. Jain, V. D. Kavimandan, S. K. Aggarwal
Nuclear Technology | Volume 42 | Number 3 | March 1979 | Pages 297-303
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32183
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The input end of a reprocessing plant is the first point in the fuel cycle where the plutonium produced in reactors can be accurately measured. The current practice for measuring the plutonium entering a reprocessing plant is to determine the total amount of this element in each batch in an accountability tank by the volume concentration method. This involves the measurement of the concentration of plutonium in the sample and the volume, density, and temperature of the solution in the tank; each of these measurements contributes to the total error in the input accountability measurement. Other approaches being studied are the Pu/U ratio method and the isotope correlation technique. These depend heavily on data from the fabrication plant and the reactor and require a good estimate of the losses through hulls. Through developing tracer techniques for the input accountability of plutonium in reprocessing plants, two tracers have been identified and tested: magnesium and lead. The corresponding techniques have been named MAGTRAP (Magnesium Tracer technique for the Accountability of Plutonium) and LEADTRAP (Lead Tracer Technique for the Accountability of Plutonium). The method involves the addition of a known amount of tracer to the input accountability tank and the subsequent measurement of the plutonium-to-tracer ratio in a sample of the tank solution. By knowing the amount of tracer element added, the total amount of plutonium in the tank can be obtained. The validity of this technique has been established by a series of experiments in the input accountability tank of a reprocessing plant. Accuracies of better than 1% are attainable by this method.