ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
S. Bian
Nuclear Technology | Volume 41 | Number 3 | December 1978 | Pages 401-407
Technical Note | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A32124
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A rod ejection accident introduces a large positive reactivity insertion in a core, causing a large power excursion. The point kinetics method is usually used to analyze this type of accident. The reactivity changes due to Doppler effect are usually obtained by static neutronics calculations with nominal (pre-ejection) core flux shapes for different fuel temperatures. The effect of locally peaked shapes due to the rod ejection is not included in the Doppler reactivity calculation. The resultant Doppler reactivity feedback is considerably underestimated, while the magnitude of the power excursion is overestimated. A simplified method that incorporates the local flux peaking effect on the Doppler feedback in a point kinetics code has been developed. The results based on this weighted Doppler feedback compare favorably with a three-dimensional kinetics analysis.