ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Gene D. Holter, Stephen E. Binney
Nuclear Technology | Volume 39 | Number 3 | August 1978 | Pages 266-274
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A32056
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Empirical data concerning fission product gamma spectra after reactor shutdown were examined. Data were ample for times long after shutdown and for long irradiation times, when long-lived nuclides predominate. However, the earlier times, which are critical to the function of the emergency core cooling system (ECCS), are ultimately more important. A simplified method of estimating gamma spectra was used, which involved sorting nuclides with known gamma spectra into “boxes” on the basis of simple nuclear systematics. A normalized spectrum for each nuclide was created from the relative intensity of each gamma energy. Nuclides were sorted by oddness or evenness of the neutron or proton number, distance from magic numbers, and distance from beta stability. In all sortings, the standard deviations of energy groups were quite large, primarily due to the fact that gamma spectra of most nuclides have a few strong lines rather than a series of many weak lines. Composite spectra were formulated from the individually sorted spectra by weighting the average relative intensities. An optimal combination of weights was derived from the composite spectra; this combination of weights was relatively independent of the number of energy groups used and the size of the magic number “bandwidth.” The optimal width for odd-evenness was usually about twice that for distance from magic number, while the weight for distance from beta stability was negligible. Final spectra representative of a specific reactor model were obtained by applying composite spectra to those fission products that contribute significant gamma activity after shutdown. For a fixed time after shutdown, final spectra for long irradiation times were more smooth than for short irradiation times. The most notable feature was a decisive shift toward softer, but less smooth, spectra as time after shutdown increased. This shift is fortunate for decay heat removal purposes, since relatively harder spectra are present before the ECCS comes into service.