ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Hyun Chul Lee, Hyung Jin Shim, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 135 | Number 1 | July 2001 | Pages 39-50
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3204
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An adaptive control scheme of simulated annealing (SA) parameters derived from the polynomial-time cooling schedule is presented in terms of the efficiency enhancement of the SA algorithm. The parallel computing adaptive SA optimization scheme, which incorporates the optimization-layer-by-layer (OLL) neutronics evaluation model is then applied to determining the optimum fuel assembly (FA) loading pattern (LP) in the Korea Nuclear Unit 2 pressurized water reactor (PWR) using seven Pentium personal computers (three 266-MHz Pentium II and four 200-MHz Pentium Pro computers). It is shown that the parallel scheme enhances the efficiency of the SA optimization computation significantly but that it can get trapped in local optimum LPs more frequently than the single-processor SA scheme unless one takes preventive steps. As a way to prevent trapping of the parallel scheme in local optima, using multiple seed LPs is proposed instead of a single LP with which the individual processors start each stage, and how to determine the multiple seed LPs is discussed. Because of the high efficiency of the parallel scheme, the acceptability of a hybrid neutronics evaluation model, which is slower but more accurate than the OLL model, in the parallel optimization calculation is examined from the standpoint of computing time. By demonstrating that the FA LP optimization calculation for the equilibrium cycle core of the KNU-2 PWR can be completed in <1 h on seven Pentiums, we justify the routine utilization of the hybrid model in the parallel SA optimization scheme.