ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
R. L. Klueh, D. A. Canonico
Nuclear Technology | Volume 36 | Number 3 | December 1977 | Pages 353-367
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31949
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The creep-rupture properties of a cylindrical Type 304 stainless-steel forging weld overlaid with Type 308 stainless-steel weld metal were evaluated. Tests were made at 755, 811, and 866 K on tangential and radial (relative to the axis of the forging cylinder) specimens taken from the weld metal, from the forging as forged, and the forging adjacent to the weld metal/forging interface. Two types of axial specimens were also tested: specimens taken from the unaffected forging and specimens taken across the fusion line. These latter specimens contained both weld metal and forging in the specimen gauge section. At all temperatures, the rupture strength of the forging immediately adjacent to the fusion line was greater than that of the forging specimens taken at a distance from the fusion line. All forging specimens were stronger than the Type 308 stainless steel of the overlay weld metal. The only effect of orientation was found for the overlay weld metal, where the tangential specimens had a slightly greater rupture life than the radial specimens. (The minimum creep rates for the two orientations were similar.) At 811 and 866 K, the ductilities of the overlay weld metal continuously decreased with increased rupture life. A minimum was found for the ductility-rupture life relationship of the Type 304 stainless-steel forging specimens at 866 K, while at 811 K, the ductility continuously decreased with increased rupture life.