ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Thermal Hydraulics
The division provides a forum for focused technical dialogue on thermal hydraulic technology in the nuclear industry. Specifically, this will include heat transfer and fluid mechanics involved in the utilization of nuclear energy. It is intended to attract the highest quality of theoretical and experimental work to ANS, including research on basic phenomena and application to nuclear system design.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Bal Raj Sehgal, Joseph A. Naser, Ching-Lu Lin, Walter B. Loewenstein
Nuclear Technology | Volume 35 | Number 3 | October 1977 | Pages 635-650
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31872
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A number of thorium-based fuels for fast breeder reactors using either sodium or helium coolant are considered. Thorium-plutonium mixed-oxide fuels have similar or slightly better material properties than those for mixed urani-um-plutonium oxides. Their thermal performance is also very similar to that of the UO2-PuO2 mixed-oxide fuel. Their nuclear performance shows a substantially lower breeding gain, but a much lower positive sodium void coefficient than those for the UO2-PuO2 system. The material properties of Th-U-Pu and Th-U metal alloys are more suitable for reactor application than those of the uranium metal alloy. The Th-U-Pu metal alloy system has higher breeding gain, much lower positive sodium void coefficient, and a possibly higher negative Doppler coefficient of reactivity than the magnitude of those parameters for the UO2-PuO2 system. The Th-233U metal alloy system has a slightly lower breeding gain than the UO2-PuO2 system, but it has a negative reactivity coefficient for sodium voiding from the core. Equilibrium fuel cycle calculations reveal that all of the thorium metal alloy systems have a longer cycle length than the UO2-PuO2 system for the same burnup constraint. Thermal-hydraulic calculations show that sodium-bonded thorium metal alloy fuel elements may be able to operate up to an ∼82 kW/m (25 kW/ft) peak power rating in sodium coolant.