ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Victoria A. Evans
Nuclear Technology | Volume 31 | Number 3 | December 1976 | Pages 319-325
Technical Paper | Reactor Siting | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31668
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
During the past five years there has been a growing trend in the states to adopt legislation for the siting of power facilities. To date, 25 states have enacted new legislation that provides for regulation of the siting of thermal power plants and transmission lines. Many other states have such requirements under consideration. The most definite trend in recent state laws is the requirement for preconstruction certification for new fossil and nuclear generating plant sites, as well as for transmission line routes. In all the 25 states, environmental protection was mandated as a fundamental policy, requiring environmental issues to be part of the considerations made by the certifying agency. Furthermore, the trend to consolidate the certification process is indicated by the fact that the majority of states, 17 of 25, have a “one-stop licensing” provision for siting power facilities. Consolidating the licensing process increases regulatory effectiveness and decreases licensing delay. Since there is the need for expediting the certification process as well as public interest in protecting environmental values in power facility siting, we can expect more states to enact similar siting and certification laws, regardless of the success of federal activity on power plant siting legislation.