ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Reboot: Nuclear needs a success . . . anywhere
The media have gleefully resurrected the language of a past nuclear renaissance. Beyond the hype and PR, many people in the nuclear community are taking a more measured view of conditions that could lead to new construction: data center demand, the proliferation of new reactor designs and start-ups, and the sudden ascendance of nuclear energy as the power source everyone wants—or wants to talk about.
Once built, large nuclear reactors can provide clean power for at least 80 years—outlasting 10 to 20 presidential administrations. Smaller reactors can provide heat and power outputs tailored to an end user’s needs. With all the new attention, are we any closer to getting past persistent supply chain and workforce issues and building these new plants? And what will the election of Donald Trump to a second term as president mean for nuclear?
As usual, there are more questions than answers, and most come down to money. Several developers are engaging with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or have already applied for a license, certification, or permit. But designs without paying customers won’t get built. So where are the customers, and what will it take for them to commit?
Noel O’Brien
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | September 1976 | Pages 237-241
Technical Paper | Uranium Resource / Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31640
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Canada, for 20 yr, has had the popular image of being the fortunate possessor of large reserves of a strategic mineral fuel and possessor of a producing industry born in a boom atmosphere, impatiently awaiting and preparing for the nuclear future to be realized. Shortly after the peak production year of 1959, the uranium industry experienced a rapid decline, one that only three companies survived as continuing producers. But by 1967 the industry was rebuilding, with producers emphasizing security and stability of supply to consumers through long-term contracts; by 1969 the international market had weakened because of oversupply, and many consumers adopted a wait-and-see attitude. The Canadian scene was transformed in 1970 when an alarmed Canadian government announced its intention to restrict foreign equity in new producer companies to 33%. A stalemate resulted, exploration was seriously dampened, and legislation to formalize the policy statements has not yet emerged. The world market passed through a depressed phase until the energy crisis, precipitated by the politics of oil, created sudden changes in fuel priorities and national policies. In Canada a uranium policy, announced in September 1974, established priority for domestic requirements, required annual review of uranium reserves, restricted export sales contracts to ten years, and required stringent nuclear safeguards agreements with importing countries. The practical application of the policy still is in its early stages, and progress has been slow. Canada will remain a major exporter for some years, since export commitments of 120 000 tons U3O8 to 1993 have been made; however, most producers are reluctant to consider new commitments until additional production capacity plans and domestic commitments are met.