ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
Douglas C. Hunt, Deanne Dickinson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 2 | August 1976 | Pages 190-214
Technical Paper | Criticality Array Data and Calculational Method / Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31615
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The , albedo, interaction potential, weighted interaction Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant solid-angle, s/v surface density, fraction critical surface density, and equilateral hyperbola methods are compared by attempting to apply them to 14 different example arrays. The example arrays are distinguished by the type of fissile material in the array units and by the number of units in each array. Arrays with units of Pu(95) metal, U(93) metal, damp U(93)O2, dry Pu(95)O2, U(93)O2(NO3)2 solution, Pu(95)(NO3)4 solution, or U(5)O2F2 solution are considered. It is concluded that if the user has access to a Monte Carlo code such as KENO, he is better off using it than any of the other models for criticality evaluations of specific problems. The remainder of the models are most useful in establishing possible designs for a fissile storage or processing facility. The albedo method is found to be the preferred solid-angle technique, while the s/v surface density method and the method are the most comprehensive and useful of the semiempirical techniques. The s/v method is easier to apply and covers more possible contingencies (e.g., array flooding or persons in arrays), while the method is more difficult to use but has added flexibility, broader applicability, and yields more analytical scaling relations between array parameters.