ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
N. J. Olson, C. M. Walter, W. N. Beck
Nuclear Technology | Volume 28 | Number 1 | January 1976 | Pages 134-151
Technical Paper | Fuels for Pulsed Reactor / Fule | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31547
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A reasonably large number (39) of Mark-IA driver fuel cladding failures have been obtained from run-to-failure experiments in the Experimental Breeder Reactor II over the past few years. These experiments were designed to yield failure information for various design variables and to qualify the fuel element design to a burnup limit such that the risk of an end-of-design-life failure was exceedingly small for normal operating conditions. None of the design variables or operating conditions tested had a significant effect on the failure statistics. The failure mode fit the Weibull statistical failure model and is characterized by a burnup threshold of 3.0 at.% maximum burnup (BUmax), which must be surpassed prior to failure. The cumulative failure probability [F(BUmax)] for peak linear pin powers between 6.4 and 8.0 kW/ft and maximum cladding temperatures from 890 to 1050°F can be expressed as Once 3.0 at.% BUmax is achieved, it was also found experimentally that the failure rate could be decreased over a small burnup interval by lowering the power ratings. The Type 304L stainless-steel cladding in-reactor fracture mode for the Mark-IA driver fuel elements is characterized by inter granular crack propagation that originates at the outside surface of the cladding. This mode of failure appears to be assisted by stress corrosion and potentially deleterious grain boundary precipitation. Although the fracture mode is brittle in nature, uniform mechanical hoop strains >1% are achieved prior to failure.