ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Joon-Eon Yang, Tae-Yong Sung, Youngho Jin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 132 | Number 3 | December 2000 | Pages 352-365
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3149
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Up to now, the optimization of surveillance test intervals (STIs) is performed at the system level. In other words, the STI of a system is optimized considering only the conditions related to that system. For instance, the STI of an emergency diesel generator (EDG) is determined considering only the availability of an EDG and the costs related to the changed STI. However, such an approach can cause problems when the effects of each system's optimized STI are combined. That is, the core damage frequency can increase to a level that cannot be accepted by the regulatory body when the STIs optimized at the system level are all adopted together. In this paper, STIs of the systems are optimized at the plant level based on the simplified probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) model of a pressurized water reactor. The PSA model includes most of the important safety systems. It is a nonlinear and multimodal optimization problem with constraints that it optimizes the STIs of various systems based on the PSA model at the plant level. Most conventional optimization techniques have difficulties in handling such multimodal and nonlinear optimization problems. Therefore, we applied a genetic algorithm to the optimization of STIs. The genetic algorithms guarantee the global optimum and find the solution very effectively. In addition, the fault trees used in PSA have some limitations in representing the real world; i.e., in estimating the unavailability of standby systems and the effects of maintenance strategies. So, the analytical unavailability model is implemented to overcome such limits of the conventional fault tree approach. The analytical unavailability model enables us to accurately estimate the effect of a maintenance strategy on the unavailability of systems. The optimized STIs based on the conventional fault tree and the analytical unavailability model are compared.