ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Candidates for leadership provide statements: ANS Board of Directors
With the annual ANS election right around the corner, American Nuclear Society members will be going to the polls to vote for a vice president/president-elect, treasurer, and members-at-large for the Board of Directors. In January, Nuclear News published statements from candidates for vice president/president-elect and treasurer. This month, we are featuring statements from each nominee for the Board of Directors.
M. H. Fontana, R. E. MacPherson, P. A. Gnadt, L. F. Parsly, J. L. Wantland
Nuclear Technology | Volume 24 | Number 2 | November 1974 | Pages 176-200
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31474
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed with a 19-rod test assembly in the fuel failure mockup sodium loop in which fuel rods were simulated by electrical cartridge heaters having the same external configuration, spacer arrangement, temperature, and heat flux as those of a typical liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR). Temperatures were measured within the rod bundle, at the exit, and along the duct walls of the rod assembly for widely varying conditions of flow and power density and for nonuniform radial power distribution. Significant differences in temperature were measured around the duct periphery. These appeared to be linearly dependent on the power density. Flow reduction caused a decrease in these measured temperature differences. Temperatures at the exit of interior subchannels agreed with analytical predictions. Those of peripheral channels, however, indicated the existence of significant swirl flow around the rod bundle and required a separate analytical treatment. In situ radiographs indicated distortion of the rod bundle toward the duct wall at elevations where the spiral wire-wrap spacers did not touch the duct wall. At each elevation, the measured circumferential temperature profile was related to the position of the wire-wrap spacers relative to the duct wall. Higher temperatures were measured on duct walls not in contact with the spacers. The measured differences in temperature around the duct periphery were of sufficient magnitude that, if present in LMFBR cores, their effect should be considered in evaluating temperature-dependent material growth due to fast-neutron irradiation.