ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
D. Guarino, V. Marinelli, L. Pastori
Nuclear Technology | Volume 23 | Number 1 | July 1974 | Pages 38-52
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31432
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Most published steady-state burnout experimental data on BWR square geometry rod bundles at 70 kg/cm2 were analyzed and compared with the main calculation methods, in order to examine the state-of-the-art in burnout power predictions. The calculations were performed using two system parameter correlations—Barnett and Macbeth, a local condition correlation—Becker, and two hydrodynamic condition correlations—CISE-III and ACHAB. Furthermore, a selected number of representative cases were calculated by means of LEUCIPPO and COBRA-II subchannel codes, in which the Becker correlations for annuli and round tubes were applied to the peripheral and central subchannels, respectively. The comparisons showed that Becker and ACHAB methods predict the burnout powers with rms errors lower than 10%, while the subchannel analysis (applied neglecting the void drift) yields errors of 20 to 25%.